Research family
Is the eROSITA S8–redshift trend dominated by a single bin?
Individual public-manifest question. The method and limitations are in its record.
1 execution record · Latest record: 09 Oct 2026
Editorial grouping by research question. Each record preserves its original identifier, priors, method, result and status. Values have not been combined, and a signal in a single run is not a global detection.
Nominal slope significance (σ)
- All bins
- 2.18 σ
- Highest-redshift bin removed
- 0.35 σ
This is a retrospective influence diagnostic for the five published bins, using only diagonal errors. The resulting significance includes no multiple-testing correction and does not identify a physical cause.
The values give the nominal significance of the S8–redshift slope, calculated from published summaries and diagonal errors. They are not S8 measurements, do not provide a global significance corrected for multiple testing, and do not identify the cause of the sensitivity.
Method, limits and provenance · T-0e94e9e2951bRuns and variants
Is the eROSITA S8–redshift trend dominated by a single bin?
Excluding the highest-redshift bin reduces the nominal slope significance from 2.18σ to 0.35σ. The trend is therefore sensitive to that bin in the fit to published summaries; these values are not a global significance corrected for multiple testing.