Research family
Fit direction and BAO components
Impact of galaxy and Lyα forest subsets on the fit.
12 execution records · Latest record: 09 Oct 2026
Editorial grouping by research question. Each record preserves its original identifier, priors, method, result and status. Values have not been combined, and a signal in a single run is not a global detection.
Runs and variants
Does the direction of the preference for evolving dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist when the BAO groups at the ends and center of the redshift range are excluded, with the prior Ωm = 0.3 ± 0.01?
The tracer groups had unequal influence on the fit. The comparison showed neither independence from every group nor exclusive dependence on a single group.
Does the direction of the preference for evolving dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist when the BAO groups at the ends and center of the redshift range are excluded, with the prior Ωm = 0.33 ± 0.01?
The direction of the preference for evolving dark energy persisted after each group was excluded. The result demonstrates internal robustness for the data and groupings examined, without establishing a global detection.
Does the direction of the preference for evolving dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist when the galaxy and Lyman-alpha forest BAO groups are excluded, with the prior Ωm = 0.3 ± 0.01?
The tracer groups had unequal influence on the fit. The comparison showed neither independence from every group nor exclusive dependence on a single group.
Does the direction of the preference for evolving dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist when the low- and high-redshift BAO groups are excluded, with the prior Ωm = 0.3 ± 0.01?
The tracer groups had unequal influence on the fit. The comparison showed neither independence from every group nor exclusive dependence on a single group.
Does the direction of the preference for evolving dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist when the BAO groups at the ends and center of the redshift range are excluded, with the prior Ωm = 0.315 ± 0.007?
The direction of the preference for evolving dark energy persisted after each group was excluded. The result demonstrates internal robustness for the data and groupings examined, without establishing a global detection.
Does the direction of the preference for evolving dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist when the low- and high-redshift BAO groups are excluded, with the prior Ωm = 0.315 ± 0.02?
A large share of the fit improvement was concentrated in one tracer group for the data and grouping examined. This concentration does not identify its cause or demonstrate a specific systematic effect.
Does the direction of the preference for evolving dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist when the low- and high-redshift BAO groups are excluded, with the prior Ωm = 0.33 ± 0.01?
A large share of the fit improvement was concentrated in one tracer group for the data and grouping examined. This concentration does not identify its cause or demonstrate a specific systematic effect.
Does the direction of the preference for evolving dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist when the low- and high-redshift BAO groups are excluded, with the prior Ωm = 0.315 ± 0.007?
The tracer groups had unequal influence on the fit. The comparison showed neither independence from every group nor exclusive dependence on a single group.
Does the direction of the preference for evolving dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist when the galaxy and Lyman-alpha forest BAO groups are excluded, with the prior Ωm = 0.315 ± 0.02?
The tracer groups had unequal influence on the fit. The comparison showed neither independence from every group nor exclusive dependence on a single group.
Does the direction of the preference for evolving dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist when the galaxy and Lyman-alpha forest BAO groups are excluded, with the prior Ωm = 0.315 ± 0.007?
The tracer groups had unequal influence on the fit. The comparison showed neither independence from every group nor exclusive dependence on a single group.
Does the direction of the preference for evolving dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist when the BAO groups at the ends and center of the redshift range are excluded, with the prior Ωm = 0.315 ± 0.02?
The direction of the preference for evolving dark energy persisted after each group was excluded. The result demonstrates internal robustness for the data and groupings examined, without establishing a global detection.
Does the direction of the preference for evolving dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist when the galaxy and Lyman-alpha forest BAO groups are excluded, with the prior Ωm = 0.33 ± 0.01?
A large share of the fit improvement was concentrated in one tracer group for the data and grouping examined. This concentration does not identify its cause or demonstrate a specific systematic effect.