Research family
Dependence on BAO tracer families
Persistence of cosmological preferences when BAO tracer families or blocks are excluded.
17 execution records · Latest record: 09 Oct 2026
Editorial grouping by research question. Each record preserves its original identifier, priors, method, result and status. Values have not been combined, and a signal in a single run is not a global detection.
Runs and variants
Does the preference for evolving dark energy in DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist when the BAO tracer families are excluded, with the prior Ωm = 0.3 ± 0.01?
The tracer groups had unequal influence on the fit. The comparison showed neither independence from every group nor exclusive dependence on a single group.
Does the preference for evolving dark energy in DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist when the BAO tracer families are excluded, with the prior Ωm = 0.315 ± 0.007?
The direction of the preference for evolving dark energy persisted after each group was excluded. The result demonstrates internal robustness for the data and groupings examined, without establishing a global detection.
Does the preference for evolving dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist when the BAO tracer families are excluded, with the prior Ωm = 0.315 ± 0.007?
The direction of the preference for evolving dark energy persisted after each group was excluded. The result demonstrates internal robustness for the data and groupings examined, without establishing a global detection.
Does the preference for evolving dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist when the low- and high-redshift BAO groups are excluded?
A large share of the fit improvement was concentrated in one tracer group for the data and grouping examined. This concentration does not identify its cause or demonstrate a specific systematic effect.
Does the preference for evolving dark energy in Pantheon+ and Union3 persist when the BAO tracer families are excluded, with the prior Ωm = 0.33 ± 0.01?
The direction of the preference for evolving dark energy persisted after each group was excluded. The result demonstrates internal robustness for the data and groupings examined, without establishing a global detection.
Does the preference for evolving dark energy in Pantheon+ and Union3 persist when the BAO tracer families are excluded, with the prior Ωm = 0.315 ± 0.007?
The direction of the preference for evolving dark energy persisted after each group was excluded. The result demonstrates internal robustness for the data and groupings examined, without establishing a global detection.
Does the preference for evolving dark energy in Pantheon+ and Union3 persist when the BAO tracer families are excluded, with the prior Ωm = 0.3 ± 0.01?
The tracer groups had unequal influence on the fit. The comparison showed neither independence from every group nor exclusive dependence on a single group.
Does the preference for evolving dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist when the BAO tracer families are excluded, with the prior Ωm = 0.3 ± 0.01?
The tracer groups had unequal influence on the fit. The comparison showed neither independence from every group nor exclusive dependence on a single group.
Does the preference for evolving dark energy in DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist when the BAO tracer families are excluded, with the prior Ωm = 0.33 ± 0.01?
The direction of the preference for evolving dark energy persisted after each group was excluded. The result demonstrates internal robustness for the data and groupings examined, without establishing a global detection.
Does the preference for evolving dark energy in DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist when the low- and high-redshift BAO groups are excluded?
The direction of the preference for evolving dark energy persisted after each group was excluded. The result demonstrates internal robustness for the data and groupings examined, without establishing a global detection.
Does the preference for evolving dark energy in Pantheon+ and Union3 persist when the BAO tracer families are excluded?
The tracer groups had unequal influence on the fit. The comparison showed neither independence from every group nor exclusive dependence on a single group.
Does the preference for evolving dark energy in Pantheon+ and Union3 persist when the low- and high-redshift BAO groups are excluded, with the prior Ωm = 0.3 ± 0.01?
The tracer groups had unequal influence on the fit. The comparison showed neither independence from every group nor exclusive dependence on a single group.
Does the preference for evolving dark energy in DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist when the DESI DR1 BAO tracer families are excluded?
The tracer groups had unequal influence on the fit. The comparison showed neither independence from every group nor exclusive dependence on a single group.
Does the preference for evolving dark energy in DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist when the BAO tracer families are excluded?
The direction of the preference for evolving dark energy persisted after each group was excluded. The result demonstrates internal robustness for the data and groupings examined, without establishing a global detection.
Does the preference for evolving dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist when the BAO tracer families are excluded?
The tracer groups had unequal influence on the fit. The comparison showed neither independence from every group nor exclusive dependence on a single group.
Does the preference for evolving dark energy in Pantheon+ and Union3 persist when the low- and high-redshift BAO groups are excluded?
A large share of the fit improvement was concentrated in one tracer group for the data and grouping examined. This concentration does not identify its cause or demonstrate a specific systematic effect.
Does the preference for evolving dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist when the BAO tracer families are excluded, with the prior Ωm = 0.33 ± 0.01?
The direction of the preference for evolving dark energy persisted after each group was excluded. The result demonstrates internal robustness for the data and groupings examined, without establishing a global detection.