Research family
BAO priors and dark-energy robustness
Variations in the BAO scale, Ωm prior and exclusion conditions.
24 execution records · Latest record: 09 Oct 2026
Editorial grouping by research question. Each record preserves its original identifier, priors, method, result and status. Values have not been combined, and a signal in a single run is not a global detection.
Runs and variants
With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 2 and Ωm = 0.315 ± 0.007, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist after excluding each tracer block?
The preference for dynamical dark energy retained the same direction in every tested group exclusion. This stability is limited to the analyzed data, priors and groupings; it does not establish a globally significant detection.
With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 2 and Ωm = 0.315 ± 0.02, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist after excluding each tracer block?
The group exclusions produced unequal responses in the fit. The comparison established neither independence of the preference from every group nor exclusive dependence on any one group.
With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 8 and Ωm = 0.3 ± 0.01, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in Pantheon+ and Union3 persist after excluding each tracer block?
The group exclusions produced unequal responses in the fit. The comparison established neither independence of the preference from every group nor exclusive dependence on any one group.
With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 8 and Ωm = 0.315 ± 0.007, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in Pantheon+ and DES-SN5YR persist after excluding each tracer block?
The preference for dynamical dark energy retained the same direction in every tested group exclusion. This stability is limited to the analyzed data, priors and groupings; it does not establish a globally significant detection.
With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 2 and Ωm = 0.3 ± 0.01, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist after excluding each tracer block?
The group exclusions produced unequal responses in the fit. The comparison established neither independence of the preference from every group nor exclusive dependence on any one group.
With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 8 and Ωm = 0.3 ± 0.01, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in Pantheon+ and DES-SN5YR persist after excluding each tracer block?
The group exclusions produced unequal responses in the fit. The comparison established neither independence of the preference from every group nor exclusive dependence on any one group.
With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 4 and Ωm = 0.3 ± 0.01, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist after excluding each tracer block?
The group exclusions produced unequal responses in the fit. The comparison established neither independence of the preference from every group nor exclusive dependence on any one group.
With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 8 and Ωm = 0.3 ± 0.01, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist after excluding each tracer block?
The group exclusions produced unequal responses in the fit. The comparison established neither independence of the preference from every group nor exclusive dependence on any one group.
With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 8 and Ωm = 0.33 ± 0.01, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist after excluding each tracer block?
The preference for dynamical dark energy retained the same direction in every tested group exclusion. This stability is limited to the analyzed data, priors and groupings; it does not establish a globally significant detection.
With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 8 and Ωm = 0.3 ± 0.01, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist after excluding each tracer block?
The group exclusions produced unequal responses in the fit. The comparison established neither independence of the preference from every group nor exclusive dependence on any one group.
With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 4 and Ωm = 0.315 ± 0.02, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist after excluding each tracer block?
The group exclusions produced unequal responses in the fit. The comparison established neither independence of the preference from every group nor exclusive dependence on any one group.
With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 4 and Ωm = 0.3 ± 0.01, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in Pantheon+ and Union3 persist after excluding each tracer block?
The group exclusions produced unequal responses in the fit. The comparison established neither independence of the preference from every group nor exclusive dependence on any one group.
With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 8 and Ωm = 0.33 ± 0.01, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist after excluding each tracer block?
The preference for dynamical dark energy retained the same direction in every tested group exclusion. This stability is limited to the analyzed data, priors and groupings; it does not establish a globally significant detection.
With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 8 and Ωm = 0.33 ± 0.01, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in Pantheon+ and Union3 persist after excluding each tracer block?
The preference for dynamical dark energy retained the same direction in every tested group exclusion. This stability is limited to the analyzed data, priors and groupings; it does not establish a globally significant detection.
With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 4 and Ωm = 0.3 ± 0.01, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in Pantheon+ and DES-SN5YR persist after excluding each tracer block?
The group exclusions produced unequal responses in the fit. The comparison established neither independence of the preference from every group nor exclusive dependence on any one group.
With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 8 and Ωm = 0.315 ± 0.007, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist after excluding each tracer block?
The preference for dynamical dark energy retained the same direction in every tested group exclusion. This stability is limited to the analyzed data, priors and groupings; it does not establish a globally significant detection.
With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 4 and Ωm = 0.3 ± 0.01, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist after excluding each tracer block?
The group exclusions produced unequal responses in the fit. The comparison established neither independence of the preference from every group nor exclusive dependence on any one group.
With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 8 and Ωm = 0.33 ± 0.01, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in Pantheon+ and DES-SN5YR persist after excluding each tracer block?
The preference for dynamical dark energy retained the same direction in every tested group exclusion. This stability is limited to the analyzed data, priors and groupings; it does not establish a globally significant detection.
With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 8 and Ωm = 0.315 ± 0.007, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist after excluding each tracer block?
The preference for dynamical dark energy retained the same direction in every tested group exclusion. This stability is limited to the analyzed data, priors and groupings; it does not establish a globally significant detection.
With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 4 and Ωm = 0.33 ± 0.01, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist after excluding each tracer block?
The preference for dynamical dark energy retained the same direction in every tested group exclusion. This stability is limited to the analyzed data, priors and groupings; it does not establish a globally significant detection.
With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 8 and Ωm = 0.315 ± 0.007, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in Pantheon+ and Union3 persist after excluding each tracer block?
The preference for dynamical dark energy retained the same direction in every tested group exclusion. This stability is limited to the analyzed data, priors and groupings; it does not establish a globally significant detection.
With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 2 and Ωm = 0.33 ± 0.01, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist after excluding each tracer block?
The preference for dynamical dark energy retained the same direction in every tested group exclusion. This stability is limited to the analyzed data, priors and groupings; it does not establish a globally significant detection.
With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 8 and Ωm = 0.315 ± 0.02, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist after excluding each tracer block?
The group exclusions produced unequal responses in the fit. The comparison established neither independence of the preference from every group nor exclusive dependence on any one group.
With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 4 and Ωm = 0.315 ± 0.007, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist after excluding each tracer block?
The preference for dynamical dark energy retained the same direction in every tested group exclusion. This stability is limited to the analyzed data, priors and groupings; it does not establish a globally significant detection.