Skip to content
← All questions

Research family

BAO priors and dark-energy robustness

Variations in the BAO scale, Ωm prior and exclusion conditions.

24 execution records · Latest record: 09 Oct 2026

Editorial grouping by research question. Each record preserves its original identifier, priors, method, result and status. Values have not been combined, and a signal in a single run is not a global detection.

Runs and variants

  1. T-0062706e5bd5Candidate

    With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 2 and Ωm = 0.315 ± 0.007, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist after excluding each tracer block?

    The preference for dynamical dark energy retained the same direction in every tested group exclusion. This stability is limited to the analyzed data, priors and groupings; it does not establish a globally significant detection.

  2. T-0633897944c1Candidate

    With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 2 and Ωm = 0.315 ± 0.02, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist after excluding each tracer block?

    The group exclusions produced unequal responses in the fit. The comparison established neither independence of the preference from every group nor exclusive dependence on any one group.

  3. T-10b57651447bCandidate

    With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 8 and Ωm = 0.3 ± 0.01, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in Pantheon+ and Union3 persist after excluding each tracer block?

    The group exclusions produced unequal responses in the fit. The comparison established neither independence of the preference from every group nor exclusive dependence on any one group.

  4. T-14ccbc39849eCandidate

    With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 8 and Ωm = 0.315 ± 0.007, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in Pantheon+ and DES-SN5YR persist after excluding each tracer block?

    The preference for dynamical dark energy retained the same direction in every tested group exclusion. This stability is limited to the analyzed data, priors and groupings; it does not establish a globally significant detection.

  5. T-1b7542e82bf0Candidate

    With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 2 and Ωm = 0.3 ± 0.01, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist after excluding each tracer block?

    The group exclusions produced unequal responses in the fit. The comparison established neither independence of the preference from every group nor exclusive dependence on any one group.

  6. T-2402743e1bc5Candidate

    With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 8 and Ωm = 0.3 ± 0.01, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in Pantheon+ and DES-SN5YR persist after excluding each tracer block?

    The group exclusions produced unequal responses in the fit. The comparison established neither independence of the preference from every group nor exclusive dependence on any one group.

  7. T-2a468105a961Candidate

    With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 4 and Ωm = 0.3 ± 0.01, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist after excluding each tracer block?

    The group exclusions produced unequal responses in the fit. The comparison established neither independence of the preference from every group nor exclusive dependence on any one group.

  8. T-430e5c51bfaeCandidate

    With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 8 and Ωm = 0.3 ± 0.01, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist after excluding each tracer block?

    The group exclusions produced unequal responses in the fit. The comparison established neither independence of the preference from every group nor exclusive dependence on any one group.

  9. T-43f34932b319Candidate

    With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 8 and Ωm = 0.33 ± 0.01, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist after excluding each tracer block?

    The preference for dynamical dark energy retained the same direction in every tested group exclusion. This stability is limited to the analyzed data, priors and groupings; it does not establish a globally significant detection.

  10. T-4547bf250443Candidate

    With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 8 and Ωm = 0.3 ± 0.01, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist after excluding each tracer block?

    The group exclusions produced unequal responses in the fit. The comparison established neither independence of the preference from every group nor exclusive dependence on any one group.

  11. T-4906aac18658Candidate

    With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 4 and Ωm = 0.315 ± 0.02, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist after excluding each tracer block?

    The group exclusions produced unequal responses in the fit. The comparison established neither independence of the preference from every group nor exclusive dependence on any one group.

  12. T-66ccf03dc95aCandidate

    With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 4 and Ωm = 0.3 ± 0.01, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in Pantheon+ and Union3 persist after excluding each tracer block?

    The group exclusions produced unequal responses in the fit. The comparison established neither independence of the preference from every group nor exclusive dependence on any one group.

  13. T-8d164854842aCandidate

    With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 8 and Ωm = 0.33 ± 0.01, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist after excluding each tracer block?

    The preference for dynamical dark energy retained the same direction in every tested group exclusion. This stability is limited to the analyzed data, priors and groupings; it does not establish a globally significant detection.

  14. T-986bac19c5ceCandidate

    With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 8 and Ωm = 0.33 ± 0.01, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in Pantheon+ and Union3 persist after excluding each tracer block?

    The preference for dynamical dark energy retained the same direction in every tested group exclusion. This stability is limited to the analyzed data, priors and groupings; it does not establish a globally significant detection.

  15. T-b3ab99a53562Candidate

    With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 4 and Ωm = 0.3 ± 0.01, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in Pantheon+ and DES-SN5YR persist after excluding each tracer block?

    The group exclusions produced unequal responses in the fit. The comparison established neither independence of the preference from every group nor exclusive dependence on any one group.

  16. T-c1a3e0fb9f26Candidate

    With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 8 and Ωm = 0.315 ± 0.007, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist after excluding each tracer block?

    The preference for dynamical dark energy retained the same direction in every tested group exclusion. This stability is limited to the analyzed data, priors and groupings; it does not establish a globally significant detection.

  17. T-c2a28f6f2e5eCandidate

    With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 4 and Ωm = 0.3 ± 0.01, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist after excluding each tracer block?

    The group exclusions produced unequal responses in the fit. The comparison established neither independence of the preference from every group nor exclusive dependence on any one group.

  18. T-c98114e25884Candidate

    With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 8 and Ωm = 0.33 ± 0.01, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in Pantheon+ and DES-SN5YR persist after excluding each tracer block?

    The preference for dynamical dark energy retained the same direction in every tested group exclusion. This stability is limited to the analyzed data, priors and groupings; it does not establish a globally significant detection.

  19. T-d0ee3e41d250Candidate

    With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 8 and Ωm = 0.315 ± 0.007, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist after excluding each tracer block?

    The preference for dynamical dark energy retained the same direction in every tested group exclusion. This stability is limited to the analyzed data, priors and groupings; it does not establish a globally significant detection.

  20. T-ea488de163c3Candidate

    With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 4 and Ωm = 0.33 ± 0.01, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist after excluding each tracer block?

    The preference for dynamical dark energy retained the same direction in every tested group exclusion. This stability is limited to the analyzed data, priors and groupings; it does not establish a globally significant detection.

  21. T-ed9ca90519ffCandidate

    With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 8 and Ωm = 0.315 ± 0.007, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in Pantheon+ and Union3 persist after excluding each tracer block?

    The preference for dynamical dark energy retained the same direction in every tested group exclusion. This stability is limited to the analyzed data, priors and groupings; it does not establish a globally significant detection.

  22. T-f901477a215fCandidate

    With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 2 and Ωm = 0.33 ± 0.01, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist after excluding each tracer block?

    The preference for dynamical dark energy retained the same direction in every tested group exclusion. This stability is limited to the analyzed data, priors and groupings; it does not establish a globally significant detection.

  23. T-fd3fcefa6269Candidate

    With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 8 and Ωm = 0.315 ± 0.02, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist after excluding each tracer block?

    The group exclusions produced unequal responses in the fit. The comparison established neither independence of the preference from every group nor exclusive dependence on any one group.

  24. T-fe29e9f5a9a2Candidate

    With a BAO scale-parameter prior of 30 ± 4 and Ωm = 0.315 ± 0.007, does the preference for dynamical dark energy in Pantheon+, DES-SN5YR and Union3 persist after excluding each tracer block?

    The preference for dynamical dark energy retained the same direction in every tested group exclusion. This stability is limited to the analyzed data, priors and groupings; it does not establish a globally significant detection.